Anthony Hoover v. Beverly Perdue
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:11-ct-03068-F. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998727998]. Mailed to: Anthony Hoover. [11-6934]
Appeal: 11-6934
Document: 14
Date Filed: 11/22/2011
Page: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6934
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
and
CHARLES MARSHALL,
Plaintiff,
v.
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE; ALVIN W. KELLER,
LEWIS; FAYE E. DANIELS; ROY COOPER,
JR.;
ROBERT
C.
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:11-ct-03068-F)
Submitted:
November 18, 2011
Decided:
November 22, 2011
Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Leon Hoover, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 11-6934
Document: 14
Date Filed: 11/22/2011
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Leon Hoover appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint as frivolous.
We
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
Hoover v. Perdue, No. 5:11-ct-03068-F (E.D.N.C. July 11,
2011).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal
before
contentions
the
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?