Anthony Hoover v. Beverly Perdue

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:11-ct-03068-F. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998727998]. Mailed to: Anthony Hoover. [11-6934]

Download PDF
Appeal: 11-6934 Document: 14 Date Filed: 11/22/2011 Page: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6934 ANTHONY LEON HOOVER, Plaintiff – Appellant, and CHARLES MARSHALL, Plaintiff, v. BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE; ALVIN W. KELLER, LEWIS; FAYE E. DANIELS; ROY COOPER, JR.; ROBERT C. Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:11-ct-03068-F) Submitted: November 18, 2011 Decided: November 22, 2011 Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Leon Hoover, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 11-6934 Document: 14 Date Filed: 11/22/2011 Page: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Anthony Leon Hoover appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hoover v. Perdue, No. 5:11-ct-03068-F (E.D.N.C. July 11, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal before contentions the court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?