Dwayne Williams v. Samuel Glover

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 6:10-cv-01591-TLW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998760557]. Mailed to: Dwayne Williams. [11-6944]

Appeal: 11-6944

Document: 10

Date Filed: 01/09/2012

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6944

DWAYNE WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SAMUEL B. GLOVER; ROBERT M. STEWARD; BARBARA A. SCOTT; JON
E. OZMINT; JOHN DOE; JANE DOE,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
(6:10-cv-01591-TLW)

Submitted:

December 12, 2011

Decided:

January 9, 2012

Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dwayne Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-6944

Document: 10

Date Filed: 01/09/2012

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Dwayne

Williams

accepting

the

dismissing

Williams’

appeals

recommendation
42

of

U.S.C.

district

the

court’s

magistrate

§ 1983

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006).
and find no reversible error.

the

(2006)

judge

complaint

order
and
under

We have reviewed the record

Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court.

Williams v. Glover, No.

6:10-cv-01591-TLW (D.S.C. July 11, 2011).

We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2