Romaine Francis v. C. T. Woody

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:09-cv-00235-REP Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998702432]. Mailed to: appellant. [11-6959]

Appeal: 11-6959

Document: 19

Date Filed: 10/18/2011

Page: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6959

ROMAINE FRANCIS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
C. T. WOODY, Sheriff, in his capacity as Sheriff for the
City of Richmond; SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT FOR THE CITY OF
RICHMOND; ANDERSON, Medical Worker; ROBERTSON, Captain of
the City of Richmond Sheriff's Department,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
STANLEY NELSON FURMAN, Doctor,
Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:09-cv-00235-REP)

Submitted:

October 13, 2011

Decided:

October 18, 2011

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Romaine Francis, Appellant Pro Se. Robert A. Dybing, William
Daniel Prince, THOMPSON MCMULLAN, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appeal: 11-6959

Document: 19

Date Filed: 10/18/2011

Page: 2 of 3

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 11-6959

Document: 19

Date Filed: 10/18/2011

Page: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Romaine

Francis

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

granting summary judgment for the Appellees on his various 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) claims.
find

no

reversible

error.

We have reviewed the record and
Accordingly,

reasons stated by the district court.

we

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

for

the

Francis v. Woody, No.

3:09-cv-00235-REP (E.D. Va. July 11, 2011).
oral

affirm

We dispense with

legal
before

contentions
the

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3