Abdiyyah Alkebulanyahh v. Thierry Nettle
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998689172-2], denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998653220-2] Originating case number: 6:10-cv-02976-MBS Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998726020]. Mailed to: Abdiyyah ben Alkebulanyahh. [11-6987]
<![CDATA[
Appeal: 11-6987
Document: 19
Date Filed: 11/18/2011
Page: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6987
ABDIYYAH BEN ALKEBULANYAHH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CAPTAIN THIERRY NETTLES, Captain; GUARD JAMES
040635; WARDEN WAYNE MCCABE; LIEUTENANT K. ARENS,
SMITH,
No
Defendants – Appellees,
and
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville.
Margaret B. Seymour, District
Judge. (6:10-cv-02976-MBS)
Submitted:
November 15, 2011
Decided:
November 18, 2011
Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Abdiyyah ben Alkebulanyahh, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Lindemann,
DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Appeal: 11-6987
Document: 19
Date Filed: 11/18/2011
Page: 2 of 3
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 11-6987
Document: 19
Date Filed: 11/18/2011
Page: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Abdiyyah
court’s
order
judge and
ben
Alkebulanyahh
accepting
denying
the
relief
no reversible error.
recommendation
without
§ 1983 (2006) complaint.
prejudice
the
district
of
the
magistrate
on
his
42
U.S.C.
We have reviewed the record and find
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
Alkebulanyahh v. Nettles, No.
stated by the district court.
6:10-cv-02976-MBS
appeals
(D.S.C.
July
13,
2011).
We
Alkebulanyahh’s motions for appointment of counsel.
deny
We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
the
court
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
