Belay Reddick v. Mary Mitchell

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:10-cv-02487-DCN Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998751745]. Mailed to: Belay Reddick. [11-7043]

Appeal: 11-7043

Document: 12

Date Filed: 12/23/2011

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7043

BELAY REDDICK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MARY M. MITCHELL; JOSEPH NEAL; R. KELSO; S. LATHROP,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, Chief District
Judge. (2:10-cv-02487-DCN)

Submitted:

December 20, 2011

Decided:

December 23, 2011

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Belay Reddick, Appellant Pro Se.
Barbara Murcier Bowens,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-7043

Document: 12

Date Filed: 12/23/2011

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Belay

Reddick

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown
Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
We

have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

Reddick v. Mitchell, No. 2:10-cv-02487-DCN (D.S.C. July

20, 2011).
legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

contentions
the

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2