Charles Rash v. Patricia Stansberry

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998720795-2] Originating case number: 3:10-cv-00836-HEH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998751645]. Mailed to: Rash. [11-7118]

Appeal: 11-7118

Document: 13

Date Filed: 12/23/2011

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7118

CHARLES E. RASH, a/k/a Charles Emmanuel Rash,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
PATRICIA STANSBERRY, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:10-cv-00836-HEH)

Submitted:

December 20, 2011

Decided:

December 23, 2011

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Emmanuel Rash, Appellant Pro Se.
Jonathan Holland
Hambrick, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-7118

Document: 13

Date Filed: 12/23/2011

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Charles

E.

Rash,

a

federal

prisoner,

appeals

the

district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241
(West 2006 & Supp. 2011) petition.
and find no reversible error.

We have reviewed the record

Accordingly, although we grant

leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court.

Rash v. Stansberry, No. 3:10-cv-

00836-HEH

2011).

(E.D.

Va.

July

22,

We

dispense

with

oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2