Benjamin Fawley v. Gene Johnson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for an evidentiary hearing [998687680-2]; denying Motion for leave to file without exhibits [998687669-2], denying Motion for leave to file without serving appellees [998687659-2] Originating case number: 7:09-cv-00041-JLK Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998792014]. Mailed to: Benjamin Fawley. [11-7147]

Appeal: 11-7147

Document: 12

Date Filed: 02/21/2012

Page: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7147

BENJAMIN WILLIAM FAWLEY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
GENE JOHNSON, Director, Department of Corrections; LARRY
HUFFMAN, Western Regional Director; R.C. MATHENA, Warden,
Keen Mountain Correctional Center; MR. D. VASS, Treatment
Program Supervisor; MS. RIFE, Protective Custody Unit
Counselor,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
OTHER JANE AND JOHN DOE OFFICIALS AND STAFF,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (7:09-cv-00041-JLK)

Submitted:

January 27, 2012

Decided:

February 21, 2012

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Appeal: 11-7147

Document: 12

Date Filed: 02/21/2012

Page: 2 of 3

Benjamin William Fawley, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Parsons,
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 11-7147

Document: 12

Date Filed: 02/21/2012

Page: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Benjamin William Fawley appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights
complaint.
error.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
Fawley v. Johnson, No. 7:09-cv-00041-JLK (W.D.

district court.

Va. July 28, 2011).

We deny Fawley’s motion for an evidentiary

hearing and deny as moot Fawley’s motions seeking leave to file
his

informal

Appellees.
legal
before

briefs

exhibits

and

without

serving

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

contentions
the

without

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

3