Daughton Lacey, Jr. v. Daniel Braxton

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:10-cv-00139-JLK Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998780452]. Mailed to: Lacey. [11-7173]

Appeal: 11-7173

Document: 15

Date Filed: 02/03/2012

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7173

DAUGHTON W. LACEY, JR., a/k/a Baruch Yah Hawkins,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DANIEL A. BRAXTON, Warden; STEVE HOLLAR, Assistant Warden;
TRACY LAWHORN, Treatment Program Supervisor; LIEUTENANT
PERRY; SERGEANT STICKLER, C/O; WORKMAN, C/O; GRIFFIN, C/O;
JOHN GARMAN, Regional Director; JOHN JABE, Deputy Director
of Operations; LIEUTENANT CANTERBURY; PHYLLIS BYRD, Law
Library Supervisor,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (7:10-cv-00139-JLK)

Submitted:

January 31, 2012

Decided:

February 3, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daughton W. Lacey, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Richard Carson
Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia,
for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-7173

Document: 15

Date Filed: 02/03/2012

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Daughton W. Lacey, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for a preliminary injunction in his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action.

We have reviewed the record and

find no abuse of discretion.

See Cienna Corp. v. Jarrard, 203

F.3d

312,

322

(4th

Cir.

2000)

(providing

review

standard).

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

Lacey v. Braxton, No. 7:10-cv-00139-JLK (W.D. Va. Aug.

1, 2011).
legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

contentions
the

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2