Michael Thrash v. Dare County Airport Authority

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:10-cv-00243-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998793366]. Mailed to: Thrash. [11-7289]

Appeal: 11-7289

Document: 14

Date Filed: 02/22/2012

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7289

MICHAEL E. THRASH,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
DARE COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
N.C. DHHS - MEDICAID ASSISTANCE; ELLA SIMMONS; JAMES
ROBINSON GILREATH, Rose, Harrison & Gilreath, P.C.; DAVID
P. FARROW, Dare County Airport Management,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (7:10-cv-00243-FL)

Submitted:

February 16, 2012

Decided:

February 22, 2012

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Eugene Thrash, Appellant Pro Se. John E. Grupp, PARKER,
POE, ADAMS & BERNSTEIN, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-7289

Document: 14

Date Filed: 02/22/2012

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Michael
orders

accepting

magistrate
(2006)

judge

Eugene
in
and

complaint.

reversible error.

Thrash

large

part

denying

We

have

appeals
the

relief

district

court’s

recommendation

on

reviewed

the

his

the

42

of

U.S.C.

record

and

the

§ 1983

find

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.

Thrash v. Dare Cnty. Airport Auth., No.

7:10-cv-00243-FL (E.D.N.C. Feb. 28, 2011; Sept. 9, 2011). *
dispense

with

no

oral

argument

because

the

facts

and

We

legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

Thrash waived appellate review of the district court’s
disposition of his claims against the Dare County Airport
Authority by failing to file specific objections to the second
report of the magistrate judge. See United States v. Midgette,
478 F.3d 616, 621-22 (4th Cir. 2007).

2