Wayne Vinson v. United States Marshall Service

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 0:10-cv-00079-RMG. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998747883]. Mailed to: Wayne Vinson. [11-7316]

Appeal: 11-7316

Document: 13

Date Filed: 12/20/2011

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7316

WAYNE VINSON,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES
JOYNER,

MARSHALS

SERVICE;

DAVID

CRANEFORD;

DEONTYE

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill.
Richard Mark Gergel, District
Judge. (0:10-cv-00079-RMG)

Submitted:

December 15, 2011

Decided:

December 20, 2011

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wayne Vinson, Appellant Pro Se. Raymond Emery Clark, Assistant
United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-7316

Document: 13

Date Filed: 12/20/2011

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Wayne

Vinson

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and
dismissing Vinson’s claims brought pursuant to the Federal Tort
Claims

Act,

Bivens v.

Six

28

U.S.C.

Unknown

§§ 1346(b),

Named

Agents

Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
find

no

reversible

error.

2671-2680
of

No.

dispense

with

Accordingly,

0:10-cv-00079-RMG
oral

argument

Fed.

and

Bureau

of

We have reviewed the record and

reasons stated by the district court.
Service,

the

(2006),

we

affirm

for

the

Vinson v. U.S. Marshals

(D.S.C.

Sept.

because

the

14,

2011).

facts

and

We
legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2