Naarl Richard v. J. Cannon, Jr.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 0:11-cv-01192-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998780383]. Mailed to: Naarl Richard. [11-7364]
Appeal: 11-7364
Document: 5
Date Filed: 02/03/2012
Page: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7364
NAARL RICHARD,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
J. AL CANNON, JR.,
Respondent – Appellee,
and
MATTHEW J. MODICA, USASC; JAMES R. DUFFY, DEA US,
Respondents.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (0:11-cv-01192-JFA)
Submitted:
January 31, 2012
Decided:
February 3, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Naarl Richard, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 11-7364
Document: 5
Date Filed: 02/03/2012
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Naarl
Richard,
a
federal
prisoner,
appeals
the
district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report
and recommendation and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241
(West 2006 & Supp. 2011) petition.
and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed the record
Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court.
0:11-cv-01192-JFA (D.S.C. Oct. 5, 2011).
Richard v. Cannon, No.
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?