Naarl Richard v. J. Cannon, Jr.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 0:11-cv-01192-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998780383]. Mailed to: Naarl Richard. [11-7364]

Download PDF
Appeal: 11-7364 Document: 5 Date Filed: 02/03/2012 Page: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-7364 NAARL RICHARD, Petitioner – Appellant, v. J. AL CANNON, JR., Respondent – Appellee, and MATTHEW J. MODICA, USASC; JAMES R. DUFFY, DEA US, Respondents. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (0:11-cv-01192-JFA) Submitted: January 31, 2012 Decided: February 3, 2012 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Naarl Richard, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 11-7364 Document: 5 Date Filed: 02/03/2012 Page: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Naarl Richard, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2011) petition. and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 0:11-cv-01192-JFA (D.S.C. Oct. 5, 2011). Richard v. Cannon, No. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?