James Lomax v. Bobby Shearin
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:09-cv-02708-DKC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998800378]. Mailed to: James Lomax. [11-7370]
Appeal: 11-7370
Document: 12
Date Filed: 03/01/2012
Page: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7370
JAMES MESHACH LOMAX,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
BOBBY SHEARIN, Warden; THE REDUCTION IN VIOLENCE COMMITTEE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District
Judge. (8:09-cv-02708-DKC)
Submitted:
February 27, 2012
Decided:
March 1, 2012
Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Meshach Lomax, Appellant Pro Se. Rex Schultz Gordon,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 11-7370
Document: 12
Date Filed: 03/01/2012
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
James
Meshach
Lomax
appeals
the
district
court’s
orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint
and denying reconsideration.
We have reviewed the record and
find
Accordingly,
no
reversible
error.
reasons stated by the district court.
we
affirm
for
the
Lomax v. Shearin, No.
8:09-cv-02708-DKC (D. Md. May 9 & Sept. 30, 2011).
We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
the
court
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?