James Lomax v. Bobby Shearin

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:09-cv-02708-DKC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998800378]. Mailed to: James Lomax. [11-7370]

Download PDF
Appeal: 11-7370 Document: 12 Date Filed: 03/01/2012 Page: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-7370 JAMES MESHACH LOMAX, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. BOBBY SHEARIN, Warden; THE REDUCTION IN VIOLENCE COMMITTEE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:09-cv-02708-DKC) Submitted: February 27, 2012 Decided: March 1, 2012 Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Meshach Lomax, Appellant Pro Se. Rex Schultz Gordon, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 11-7370 Document: 12 Date Filed: 03/01/2012 Page: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: James Meshach Lomax appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find Accordingly, no reversible error. reasons stated by the district court. we affirm for the Lomax v. Shearin, No. 8:09-cv-02708-DKC (D. Md. May 9 & Sept. 30, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?