Danny Smith v. County of Picken

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:10-cv-02265-JMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998823225]. Mailed to: Danny Smith. [11-7391]

Appeal: 11-7391

Document: 18

Date Filed: 04/02/2012

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7391

DANNY RAYBURN SMITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
COUNTY OF PICKENS; SHERIFF DAVID STONE, Pickens County
Sheriff; DEWEY SMITH, Captain; ANDERSON COUNTY; MICHAEL
SLOAN, Detective; DAN RHODES; GREENVILLE COUNTY; DAVID
HANKS, Detective; LARRY MARTIN, Detective,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson.
J. Michelle Childs, District
Judge. (8:10-cv-02265-JMC)

Submitted:

March 29, 2012

Decided:

April 2, 2012

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Danny Rayburn Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Russell W. Harter, Jr.,
CHAPMAN, HARTER & GROVES, PA, Greenville, South Carolina; James
Victor McDade, DOYLE, O’ROURKE, TATE & MCDADE, PA, Anderson,
South Carolina; J. Calhoun Pruitt, Jr., PRUITT AND PRUITT,
Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-7391

Document: 18

Date Filed: 04/02/2012

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Danny Rayburn Smith appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief

on

his

claims

return of property.
reversible error.

under

42

U.S.C.

§ 1983

(2006)

and

for

We have reviewed the record and find no

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.

Smith v. County of Pickens, No. 8:10-cv-

02265-JMC (D.S.C. Aug. 25, 2011; Oct. 26, 2011).

We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately

presented

in

the

materials

before

the

court

and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2