David Wicks v. Brenda Shell-Eleazer

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-01570-RDB. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998839748]. Mailed to: David Bryant Wicks. [11-7414]

Appeal: 11-7414

Document: 30

Date Filed: 04/25/2012

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7414

DAVID BRYANT WICKS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
BRENDA SHELL-ELEAZER; TIMOTHY R. FALOON,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:11-cv-01570-RDB)

Submitted:

April 19, 2012

Decided:

April 25, 2012

Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Bryant Wicks, Appellant Pro Se.
Hamilton F. Tyler, ANNE
ARUNDEL COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Annapolis, Maryland; Philip Melton
Andrews, Jeremy C.B. Wyatt, KRAMON & GRAHAM, PA, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-7414

Document: 30

Date Filed: 04/25/2012

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
David Bryant Wicks appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

We

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
Wicks v. Shell-Eleazer, No. 1:11-cv-01570-RDB (D. Md.

court.

Sept. 22, 2011).
facts

and

materials

legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions

are

adequately

the

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2