Monte Winston v. Patricia Stansberry

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998765954-2], [998753186-2]; denying Motion for summary disposition (Local Rule 27(f)) [998731288-2], updating fee code Originating case number: 3:10-cv-00631-REP Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998842916]. Mailed to: Winston. [11-7429]

Appeal: 11-7429

Document: 20

Date Filed: 04/30/2012

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7429

MONTE DECARLOS WINSTON,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY,
Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:10-cv-00631-REP)

Submitted:

April 26, 2012

Decided:

April 30, 2012

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Monte Decarlos Winston, Appellant Pro Se.
Debra J. Prillaman,
Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-7429

Document: 20

Date Filed: 04/30/2012

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Monte

Decarlos

Winston,

a

federal

prisoner,

appeals

the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A.
§ 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2011) petition and denying his Fed. R.
Civ. P. 59(e) motion to amend or alter that judgment.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

We have

Accordingly,

although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court.

See Winston v.

Stansberry, No. 3:10-cv-00631-REP (E.D. Va. July 11 & Sept. 26,
2011).
We

Further, we deny Winston’s motion for summary judgment.

dispense

with

oral

argument

because

the

facts

and

legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2