Ramon Chapman v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:11-cv-00368-RBS-DEM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998780155]. Mailed to: Ramon Chapman. [11-7431]

Appeal: 11-7431

Document: 5

Date Filed: 02/03/2012

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7431

RAMON CHARLES CHAPMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief
District Judge. (2:11-cv-00368-RBS-DEM)

Submitted:

January 31, 2012

Decided:

February 3, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ramon Charles Chapman, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-7431

Document: 5

Date Filed: 02/03/2012

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Ramon

Charles

Chapman

appeals

the

district

court’s

order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without
prejudice
appeal,

we

pursuant

to

confine

Appellant’s brief.

28

our

U.S.C.

review

to

§ 1915A(b)(2)
the

issues

See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).

(2006).
raised

in

On
the

Because Chapman’s

informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district
court’s disposition, Chapman has forfeited appellate review of
the court’s order.
judgment.
legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

contentions
the

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2