Andres Sanchez v. Dominic McLain

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:07-cv-00355 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998825456]. Mailed to: Andres Javier Sanchez. [11-7468]

Appeal: 11-7468

Document: 14

Date Filed: 04/04/2012

Page: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7468

ANDRES JAVIER SANCHEZ,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DOMINIC MCLAIN; ROGER EDWARDS,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
CHARLES FELTS, Warden; KEVIN THOMPSON; K. M. WHITE; HARRELL
WATTS,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Beckley.
Thomas E. Johnston,
District Judge. (5:07-cv-00355)

Submitted:

March 15, 2012

Decided:

April 4, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andres Javier Sanchez, Appellant Pro Se.
Krivonyak, Assistant United States Attorney,
Virginia, for Appellees.

J. Christopher
Charleston, West

Appeal: 11-7468

Document: 14

Date Filed: 04/04/2012

Page: 2 of 3

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 11-7468

Document: 14

Date Filed: 04/04/2012

Page: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Andres
court’s
motions,

Javier
judgment

amended
denying

Sanchez
order

Defendants’

appeals
denying

motion

in

from

district

summary

his

the

judgment

limine

as

moot,

and

granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative,
for

summary

judgment,

on

his

claims

against

them,

which

the

district court construed as claims brought pursuant to Bivens v.
Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S.
388

(1971),

and

the

Federal

Tort

Claims

§§ 2671-2680 (West 2006 & Supp. 2011).
record and find no reversible error.

Act,

28

U.S.C.A.

We have reviewed the

Accordingly, we affirm the

district court’s amended judgment order.

See Sanchez v. McLain,

No. 5:07-cv-00355 (S.D. W. Va. Oct. 6, 2011).

We dispense with

oral

contentions

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

the

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

3