Timothy McCoy v. Kuma DeBoo

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for transcript at government expense [998737191-2] Originating case number: 2:11-cv-00076-JPB-DJJ Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998793438]. Mailed to: McCoy. [11-7480]

Download PDF
Appeal: 11-7480 Document: 19 Date Filed: 02/22/2012 Page: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-7480 TIMOTHY WAYNE MCCOY, Petitioner – Appellant, v. WARDEN KUMA J. DEBOO, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (2:11-cv-00076-JPB-DJJ) Submitted: February 16, 2012 Decided: February 22, 2012 Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Timothy W. McCoy, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 11-7480 Document: 19 Date Filed: 02/22/2012 Page: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Timothy Wayne McCoy, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2011) petition and his motion to contact jurors. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. McCoy v. 2:11-cv-00076-JPB-DJJ (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 26, 2011). DeBoo, No. In addition, we have considered McCoy’s motion to contact jurors separately from his § 2241 petition, and we find it was correctly denied. We deny McCoy’s motion for a transcript at Government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?