Wister King, Jr. v. Charles Strau

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998732552-2] Originating case number: 1:11-cv-01041-GBL-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998812611]. Mailed to: King. [11-7483]

Appeal: 11-7483

Document: 11

Date Filed: 03/19/2012

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7483

WISTER KING, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHARLES J. STRAUSS, Judge; R. BRYAN HASKINS, Attorney for the
Commonwealth, Esq.,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (1:11-cv-01041-GBL-JFA)

Submitted:

March 15, 2012

Decided:

March 19, 2012

Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wister King, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-7483

Document: 11

Date Filed: 03/19/2012

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Wister King, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

We

error.

Accordingly, we deny King’s motion for appointment of counsel
and

affirm

for

the

reasons

stated

by

the

district

court.

King v. Strauss, No. 1:11-cv-01041-GBL-JFA (E.D. Va. filed Oct.
17,

2011;

entered

Oct.

20,

2011).

We

dispense

with

oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2