Lawrence Coxson v. Jeffrey Shank

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:07-cv-01976-RWT. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998798166]. Mailed to: Lawrence Coxson. [11-7489]

Appeal: 11-7489

Document: 15

Date Filed: 02/28/2012

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7489

LAWRENCE ADRAIN COXSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JEFFREY SHANK, MCTC;
ATTORNEY GENERAL,

MARVIN

METZ,

MCTC;

UNKNOWN

OFFICER;

Defendants - Appellees,
and
RAKESH MALIK, Dr.; CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC.,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:07cv-01976-RWT)

Submitted:

February 23, 2012

Decided:

February 28, 2012

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lawrence Adrain Coxson, Appellant Pro Se.
Sarah W. Rice,
Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-7489

Document: 15

Date Filed: 02/28/2012

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Lawrence

Adrain

Coxson

appeals

the

district

court’s

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the
Appellant’s brief.

See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).

Because Coxson’s

informal brief raises no issues challenging the district court’s
disposition,
court’s

order.

judgment.
legal
before

Coxson

forfeited

Accordingly,

we

appellate

affirm

the

review

of

district

the

court’s

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

contentions
the

has

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2