Charles Brooks, III v. Doe

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for transcript at government expense [998750895-2] Originating case number: 2:11-cv-00568-MSD-FBS. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998798168]. Mailed to: Charles Brooks. [11-7629]

Appeal: 11-7629

Document: 12

Date Filed: 02/28/2012

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7629

CHARLES BROOKS, III,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOHN DOE, Warden Senior of Sussex II State Prison; VARGO,
Assistant Warden,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (2:11-cv-00568-MSD-FBS)

Submitted:

February 23, 2012

Decided:

February 28, 2012

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Brooks, III, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-7629

Document: 12

Date Filed: 02/28/2012

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Charles

Brooks,

III,

appeals

the

district

court’s

order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006).
that

this

appeal

is

We have reviewed the record and find

frivolous.

Accordingly,

we

dismiss

appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.

Brooks v.

Doe, No. 2:11-cv-00568-MSD-FBS (E.D. Va. Nov. 9, 2011).
deny

Brooks’

expense.
legal
before

pending

motion

for

transcripts

at

the

We also

government

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

contentions
the

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.

DISMISSED

2