Nathaniel Jones v. L. Manning

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 0:11-cv-01093-JMC. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998867029]. Mailed to: Nathaniel Jones. [11-7641]

Download PDF
Appeal: 11-7641 Doc: 20 Filed: 06/04/2012 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-7641 NATHANIEL HAMPTON JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. L. CASEY MANNING, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (0:11-cv-01093-JMC) Submitted: May 22, 2012 Decided: June 4, 2012 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nathaniel Hampton Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Lindemann, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 11-7641 Doc: 20 Filed: 06/04/2012 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Nathaniel Hampton Jones appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing with prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. the appeal for the reasons stated Accordingly, we dismiss by the district court. Jones v. Manning, No. 0:11-cv-01093-JMC (D.S.C. filed Nov. 16, 2011 & entered Nov. 17, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?