Douglas Hall v. James Johnson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--dismissing Motion for other relief filed by Appellant Douglas Hall [998762565-2] Originating case number: 7:11-cv-00143-GRA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998842841]. Mailed to: Douglas Hall. [11-7656]

Download PDF
Appeal: 11-7656 Document: 20 Date Filed: 04/30/2012 Page: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-7656 DOUGLAS HALL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JAMES JOHNSON; BRIAN A. BAILEY, Defendants - Appellees, and JAMES MCNEIL; BUCKEY SPROUSE, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (7:11-cv-00143-GRA) Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: April 30, 2012 Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Douglas Hall, Appellant Pro Se. Russell W. Harter, Jr., CHAPMAN, HARTER & GROVES, PA, Greenville, South Carolina; William Henry Davidson, II, Daniel C. Plyler, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 11-7656 Document: 20 Date Filed: 04/30/2012 Page: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Douglas Hall appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson, No. dispense with 7:11-cv-00143-GRA oral argument (D.S.C. because Nov. the the Hall v. 8, 2011). facts and We legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?