Douglas Hall v. James Johnson
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--dismissing Motion for other relief filed by Appellant Douglas Hall [998762565-2] Originating case number: 7:11-cv-00143-GRA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998842841]. Mailed to: Douglas Hall. [11-7656]
Appeal: 11-7656
Document: 20
Date Filed: 04/30/2012
Page: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7656
DOUGLAS HALL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JAMES JOHNSON; BRIAN A. BAILEY,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
JAMES MCNEIL; BUCKEY SPROUSE,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg.
G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (7:11-cv-00143-GRA)
Submitted:
April 26, 2012
Decided:
April 30, 2012
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Douglas Hall, Appellant Pro Se.
Russell W. Harter, Jr.,
CHAPMAN, HARTER & GROVES, PA, Greenville, South Carolina;
William Henry Davidson, II, Daniel C. Plyler, DAVIDSON &
LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 11-7656
Document: 20
Date Filed: 04/30/2012
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Douglas
Hall
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief
on
his
42
U.S.C.
§ 1983
(2006)
complaint.
We
have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly,
we
dismiss
deny
leave
to
proceed
in
forma
pauperis
and
appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.
Johnson,
No.
dispense
with
7:11-cv-00143-GRA
oral
argument
(D.S.C.
because
Nov.
the
the
Hall v.
8,
2011).
facts
and
We
legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?