US v. Lawrence Daley
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998745986-2] Originating case number: 2:99-cr-00183-RBS-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998824383]. Mailed to: Lawrence Daley. [11-7675]
Appeal: 11-7675
Document: 12
Date Filed: 04/03/2012
Page: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7675
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LAWRENCE FRANKLIN DALEY, a/k/a Born,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief
District Judge. (2:99-cr-00183-RBS-1)
Submitted:
March 29, 2012
Decided:
April 3, 2012
Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lawrence Franklin Daley, Appellant Pro Se.
Darryl James
Mitchell, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 11-7675
Document: 12
Date Filed: 04/03/2012
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Lawrence Franklin Daley appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006).
We have reviewed the record and
find
Accordingly,
no
reversible
error.
reasons stated by the district court.
we
affirm
for
the
United States v. Daley,
No. 2:99-cr-00183-RBS-1 (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 30, 2011 & entered
Dec.
1,
2011).
We
deny
Daley’s
motion
for
appointment
of
counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal
before
contentions
the
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?