Lonnie Oglesbee v. Terry O'Brien

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motions submitting evidence and petitioniing for help [998841989-2] [998828060-2] Originating case number: 7:10-cv-00322-JLK Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998919433]. Mailed to: Oglesbee. [11-7684]

Appeal: 11-7684

Doc: 24

Filed: 08/20/2012

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7684

LONNIE OGLESBEE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
WARDEN TERRY O'BRIEN; CAPTAIN WILSON; CAPTAINS JOHNSON;
S.I.A. PITT; A.M. SHIFT PRISON GUARDS; WEBB, Special
Housing Unit Guard; KEGLEY, Special Housing Unit Guard; C/O
HAMILTON, Special Housing Unit Guard; ANDERS, Special
Housing Unit Guard; MOORE, Special Housing Unit Guard; MR.
FORTNER, Special Housing Unit Guard; STANLEY, Special
Housing Unit Guard; JARRELL, Special Housing Unit Guard;
OTHER UNNAMED GUARDS, Special Housing Unit; SHREIBER,
Special Housing Lieutenant,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (7:10-cv-00322-JLK)

Submitted:

August 16, 2012

Decided:

August 20, 2012

Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lonnie Mack Oglesbee, Appellant Pro Se.

Appeal: 11-7684

Doc: 24

Filed: 08/20/2012

Pg: 2 of 3

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 11-7684

Doc: 24

Filed: 08/20/2012

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Lonnie

Mack

Oglesbee

appeals

the

district

court’s

order denying his motion for free copies and indigent stamps.
We

have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

Oglesbee v. O’Brien, No. 7:10-cv-00322-JLK (W.D. Va.

Oct. 24, 2011).

We deny Oglesbee’s motions submitting evidence

and

for

petitioning

help.

We

dispense

with

oral

argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3