US v. Ranchez Shelley

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:06-cr-01225-JFA-3. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998900066]. Mailed to: Ranchez Shelley. [11-7688]

Appeal: 11-7688

Doc: 11

Filed: 07/23/2012

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7688
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RANCHEZ SHELLEY,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (3:06-cr-01225-JFA-3)
Submitted:

July 19, 2012

Decided:

July 23, 2012

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ranchez Shelley, Appellant Pro Se. John David Rowell, Assistant
United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-7688

Doc: 11

Filed: 07/23/2012

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Ranchez Shelley seeks to appeal the district court’s
orders denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a
reduction

of

sentence

and

motion

for

reconsideration.

We

confine our review to the issue raised in the informal brief.
4th

Cir.

district

R.

34(b).

court’s

Because

disposition

Shelley

does

of

§ 3582

the

not

forfeited appellate review of that order.
motion

for

reconsideration,

the

court

facts

and

materials

legal
before

he

has

lacked

the

See United States v.

Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 236 (4th Cir. 2010).
the court’s order.

motion,

the

With regard to the

district

authority to consider Shelley’s motion.

challenge

We therefore affirm

We dispense with oral argument because the

contentions

are

adequately

the

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2