Timothy Jones v. Carolyn Robinson
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:11-cv-00596-JRS. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998842863]. Mailed to: Timothy Jones. [11-7718]
Appeal: 11-7718
Document: 7
Date Filed: 04/30/2012
Page: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7718
TIMOTHY A. JONES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CAROLYN ROBINSON, Accounting Staff, Haynesville Correctional
Unit #17; JANE DOE; JOHN DOE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (3:11-cv-00596-JRS)
Submitted:
April 26, 2012
Decided:
April 30, 2012
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy A. Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 11-7718
Document: 7
Date Filed: 04/30/2012
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Timothy A. Jones appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his civil suit because Jones did
not
return
consent
to
a
completed
collection
statutory filing fee.
reversible error.
Va.
Nov.
of
forma
fees
pauperis
form
and
affidavit
he
did
not
form
and
pay
the
We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
(E.D.
in
18,
Jones v. Robinson, No. 3:11-cv-00596-JRS
2011).
We
dispense
with
oral
argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?