Timothy Jones v. Carolyn Robinson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:11-cv-00596-JRS. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998842863]. Mailed to: Timothy Jones. [11-7718]

Download PDF
Appeal: 11-7718 Document: 7 Date Filed: 04/30/2012 Page: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-7718 TIMOTHY A. JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CAROLYN ROBINSON, Accounting Staff, Haynesville Correctional Unit #17; JANE DOE; JOHN DOE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (3:11-cv-00596-JRS) Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: April 30, 2012 Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Timothy A. Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 11-7718 Document: 7 Date Filed: 04/30/2012 Page: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Timothy A. Jones appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his civil suit because Jones did not return consent to a completed collection statutory filing fee. reversible error. Va. Nov. of forma fees pauperis form and affidavit he did not form and pay the We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. (E.D. in 18, Jones v. Robinson, No. 3:11-cv-00596-JRS 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?