Dennis Jemison v. Warden Deboo
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-00047-JES Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998839776]. Mailed to: Jemison. [11-7721]
Appeal: 11-7721
Document: 12
Date Filed: 04/25/2012
Page: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7721
DENNIS ELIJAH JEMISON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN K. DEBOO; R. REED, Counselor, A3 Unit Team; D. SMITH,
Case Manager, A3 Unit Team; D. HEADY, A3 Unit Team, Unit
Manager; RANKIN, Assistant Warden; E. BORAM, Health Services
Administrator; MOHONEY, Officer; BRIGHT, Officer; BONNELL,
Officer; J. CLAYTON, Lt.; A. SLIGAR, Lt.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg.
James E. Seibert,
Magistrate Judge. (1:11-cv-00047-JES)
Submitted:
April 19, 2012
Decided:
April 25, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dennis Elijah Jemison, Appellant Pro Se.
Rita R. Valdrini,
Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 11-7721
Document: 12
Date Filed: 04/25/2012
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Dennis Elijah Jemison appeals the magistrate judge’s
order *
to
denying
Bivens v.
relief
Six
on
Unknown
his
Named
Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
find
no
reversible
error.
complaint
Agents
of
Accordingly,
we
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
Bureau
of
facts
and
materials
affirm
for
the
Jemison v. Deboo, No.
1:11-cv-00047-JES (N.D.W. Va. Dec. 7, 2011).
argument
Fed.
pursuant
We have reviewed the record and
reasons stated by the magistrate judge.
oral
filed
We dispense with
legal
before
contentions
the
court
are
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate
judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006).
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?