Dennis Jemison v. Warden Deboo

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-00047-JES Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998839776]. Mailed to: Jemison. [11-7721]

Download PDF
Appeal: 11-7721 Document: 12 Date Filed: 04/25/2012 Page: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-7721 DENNIS ELIJAH JEMISON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WARDEN K. DEBOO; R. REED, Counselor, A3 Unit Team; D. SMITH, Case Manager, A3 Unit Team; D. HEADY, A3 Unit Team, Unit Manager; RANKIN, Assistant Warden; E. BORAM, Health Services Administrator; MOHONEY, Officer; BRIGHT, Officer; BONNELL, Officer; J. CLAYTON, Lt.; A. SLIGAR, Lt., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. James E. Seibert, Magistrate Judge. (1:11-cv-00047-JES) Submitted: April 19, 2012 Decided: April 25, 2012 Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dennis Elijah Jemison, Appellant Pro Se. Rita R. Valdrini, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 11-7721 Document: 12 Date Filed: 04/25/2012 Page: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Dennis Elijah Jemison appeals the magistrate judge’s order * to denying Bivens v. relief Six on Unknown his Named Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). find no reversible error. complaint Agents of Accordingly, we adequately because presented in the the Bureau of facts and materials affirm for the Jemison v. Deboo, No. 1:11-cv-00047-JES (N.D.W. Va. Dec. 7, 2011). argument Fed. pursuant We have reviewed the record and reasons stated by the magistrate judge. oral filed We dispense with legal before contentions the court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006). 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?