Kevin Jones v. SC Attorney General
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for other relief [998786983-2] Originating case number: 1:11-cv-03110-MBS Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998794595]. Mailed to: Jones. [12-1000]
Appeal: 12-1000
Document: 8
Date Filed: 02/23/2012
Page: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1000
KEVIN JONES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SOUTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY
CORP; DR. GEORGE MAHA,
GENERAL;
JUDGE
DOYET
EARLY;
LAB
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken. Joseph R. McCrorey, Magistrate Judge.
(1:11-cv-03110-MBS)
Submitted:
February 16, 2012
Decided:
February 23, 2012
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-1000
Document: 8
Date Filed: 02/23/2012
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Kevin
Jones
seeks
to
appeal
a
magistrate
judge’s
report and recommendation that his civil rights complaint be
dismissed.
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and
collateral
orders,
28
U.S.C.
§ 1292
(2006);
Fed.
R.
Civ.
P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 54546 (1949).
order
nor
The order Jones seeks to appeal is neither a final
an
appealable
interlocutory
or
collateral
order.
Accordingly, we deny Jones’ motion for seizure and dismiss the
appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?