In re: Jamal Azeez

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [998853817-2], denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [998760081-2] Originating case number: 5:06-cv-00106 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998864936]. Mailed to: Jamal Azeez. [12-1029]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-1029 Doc: 9 Filed: 05/31/2012 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1029 In Re: JAMAL A. AZEEZ, Petitioner. -------------------------FRANCIS M. CURNUTTE, III, Attorney at Law, Respondent. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:06-cv-00106) Submitted: May 18, 2012 Decided: May 31, 2012 Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jamal A. Azeez, Petitioner Pro Se. Francis M. Curnutte, III, FARMER, CLINE & CAMPBELL, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 12-1029 Doc: 9 Filed: 05/31/2012 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Jamal A. Azeez petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (2006) action. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately the and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?