Edward Shlikas v. Arrow Financial Service
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:06-cv-02106-WDQ Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998906983]. Mailed to: Edward G. Shlikas. [12-1043]
Appeal: 12-1043
Doc: 42
Filed: 08/01/2012
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1043
EDWARD G. SHLIKAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ARROW
FINANCIAL
SERVICES;
PIONEER
CREDIT
RECOVERY,
INCORPORATED; DIVERSIFIED COLLECTION SERVICES, INCORPORATED;
JEFFREY CARLINO; OSI EDUCATION SERVICES, INCORPORATED;
SALLIE MAE, INCORPORATED; GREAT LAKES HIGHER EDUCATION
GUARANTY
CORPORATION;
UNITED
STUDENT
AID
FUNDS,
INCORPORATED; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
HEMAR; NORWEST, INCORPORATED; WELLS FARGO, INCORPORATED;
GOLDBERG SEGALLA LLP; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE
TREASURY; MARYLAND STATE COMPTROLLER OF THE TREASURY,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
William D. Quarles, Jr., District
Judge. (1:06-cv-02106-WDQ)
Submitted:
June 21, 2012
Decided:
Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
August 1, 2012
Appeal: 12-1043
Doc: 42
Filed: 08/01/2012
Pg: 2 of 3
Edward G. Shlikas, Appellant Pro Se.
Rand Lewis Gelber, LAW
OFFICES OF RAND L. GELBER, Rockville, Maryland; Jonathan Edward
Claiborne,
WHITEFORD,
TAYLOR
&
PRESTON,
LLP,
Baltimore,
Maryland; Larry David Adams, Assistant United States Attorney,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 12-1043
Doc: 42
Filed: 08/01/2012
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Edward G. Shlikas appeals from the district court’s
orders entering judgment in favor of the Defendants on his civil
action and denying, in part, his motion for attorney fees and
costs.
We
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district
have
reviewed
court.
Shlikas
the
v.
record
Arrow
and
Fin.
find
Servs.,
no
reversible
No.
1:06-cv-
02106-WDQ (D. Md. Nov. 17, 2007; June 5, 2008; May 4, 2009;
Aug. 26, 2010; Nov. 16, 2011).
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?