Steven Ivey v. Fair Labor Relations Authority

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:10-cv-00064-D. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998877929]. Mailed to: Steven Ivey. [12-1086]

Appeal: 12-1086

Doc: 19

Filed: 06/19/2012

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1086

STEVEN IVEY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
FAIR
LABOR
RELATIONS
AUTHORITY,
a/k/a
Federal
Labor
Relations Authority; NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
DOUG VAN BUREN; LISA PORTER; ANGELA STRONG,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. James C. Dever,
III, Chief District Judge. (2:10-cv-00064-D)

Submitted:

June 11, 2012

Decided:

June 19, 2012

Before KEENAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Ivey, Appellant Pro Se.
Pamela Penny Johnson, Rosa M.
Koppel, FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Washington, D.C.;
Peyton H.N. Lawrimore, L. Pat Wynns, NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES
UNION, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Appeal: 12-1086

Doc: 19

Filed: 06/19/2012

Pg: 2 of 3

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 12-1086

Doc: 19

Filed: 06/19/2012

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Steven Ivey seeks to appeal the district court’s order
granting the Defendants’ motions to dismiss his complaint.

We

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice
of appeal was not timely filed.
When the United States or its officer or agency is a
party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty
days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or
order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court
extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or
reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).
timely

filing

of

a

notice

jurisdictional requirement.”

of

appeal

in

a

civil

“[T]he

case

is

a

Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205,

214 (2007).
The district court’s order was entered on the docket
on October 24, 2011.
17, 2012.

The notice of appeal was filed on January

Because Ivey failed to file a timely notice of appeal

or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we
dismiss the appeal.
facts

and

materials

legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the

contentions

are

adequately

the

and

argument

Court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
3