Patrick Christian v. James Townsend

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:12-cv-00021-MOC-DCK Copies to all parties and the district court. [998813813]. Mailed to: Patrick Christian. [12-1100]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-1100 Document: 7 Date Filed: 03/20/2012 Page: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1100 PATRICK O. CHRISTIAN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. JAMES TOWNSEND, Property Manager, Monroe Hall; RODNEY MOORE, Chief of Police, Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department; DANIEL E. BAILEY, JR., Sheriff, Mecklenburg County Sheriff Department; TOM CALLAHAN, US Postmaster, Charlotte Mecklenburg US Post Office; CARSON DEAN, CEO, Charlotte Mecklenburg Mens Homeless Shelter; FNU BURKE, General Surgeon, W.G. Hefner VA Medical Center; LYNN R. HOLMES, Chief Executive Officer, NC Employment Security Commission, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:12-cv-00021-MOC-DCK) Submitted: March 15, 2012 Decided: March 20, 2012 Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Patrick O. Christian, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 12-1100 Document: 7 Date Filed: 03/20/2012 Page: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Patrick order O. Christian dismissing his civil § 1915(e) (2006). appeals rights the complaint district under We dispense 3:12-cv-00021-MOC-DCK with U.S.C. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. No. 28 We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Townsend, court’s oral argument (W.D.N.C. because the Christian v. Jan. facts 19, and 2012). legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?