Patrick Christian v. James Townsend
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:12-cv-00021-MOC-DCK Copies to all parties and the district court. [998813813]. Mailed to: Patrick Christian. [12-1100]
Appeal: 12-1100
Document: 7
Date Filed: 03/20/2012
Page: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1100
PATRICK O. CHRISTIAN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
JAMES TOWNSEND, Property Manager, Monroe Hall; RODNEY
MOORE, Chief of Police, Charlotte Mecklenburg Police
Department; DANIEL E. BAILEY, JR., Sheriff, Mecklenburg
County Sheriff Department; TOM CALLAHAN, US Postmaster,
Charlotte Mecklenburg US Post Office; CARSON DEAN, CEO,
Charlotte Mecklenburg Mens Homeless Shelter; FNU BURKE,
General Surgeon, W.G. Hefner VA Medical Center; LYNN R.
HOLMES, Chief Executive Officer, NC Employment Security
Commission,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr.,
District Judge. (3:12-cv-00021-MOC-DCK)
Submitted:
March 15, 2012
Decided:
March 20, 2012
Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Patrick O. Christian, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-1100
Document: 7
Date Filed: 03/20/2012
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Patrick
order
O.
Christian
dismissing
his
civil
§ 1915(e) (2006).
appeals
rights
the
complaint
district
under
We
dispense
3:12-cv-00021-MOC-DCK
with
U.S.C.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal
for the reasons stated by the district court.
No.
28
We have reviewed the record and find that
this appeal is frivolous.
Townsend,
court’s
oral
argument
(W.D.N.C.
because
the
Christian v.
Jan.
facts
19,
and
2012).
legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?