Eugene Harrison v. T. Brown

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:10-cv-02642-RMG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998840097]. Mailed to: Eugene Harrison. [12-1142]

Appeal: 12-1142

Document: 13

Date Filed: 04/25/2012

Page: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1142

EUGENE P. HARRISON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
T. BROWN, Sergeant, Detective, Taevor; ROBERT BURNISH,
Sergeant; JERRY KELLY, Corporal; SIMON MAJOR, Sumter Lee
Detention Center President; JON OZMINT, South Carolina
Department of Correction,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
SUMTER COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT; SUMTER
CENTER; SCDC COMMISSIONER; SOUTH CAROLINA
CORRECTION,

LEE DETENTION
DEPARTMENT OF

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia.
Richard Mark Gergel, District
Judge. (3:10-cv-02642-RMG)

Submitted:

April 19, 2012

Decided:

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam.

April 25, 2012

Appeal: 12-1142

Document: 13

Date Filed: 04/25/2012

Page: 2 of 3

Eugene P. Harrison, Appellant Pro Se. James M. Davis, Jr., Joel
Steve Hughes, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South
Carolina, Edgar Lloyd Willcox, II, WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA,
Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 12-1142

Document: 13

Date Filed: 04/25/2012

Page: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Eugene P. Harrison appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief

on

his

42

U.S.C.

§ 1983

(2006)

complaint.

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
we

affirm

for

the

stated

by

have

Accordingly,
the

district

See Harrison v. Brown, No. 3:10-cv-02642-RMG (D.S.C.

court.

Jan. 24, 2012).
facts

reasons

We

and

materials

legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions

are

adequately

the

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3