Miachel Hicks v. Hilda Soli

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:10-cv-01404 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998863699]. Mailed to: Hicks. [12-1151]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-1151 Doc: 15 Filed: 05/30/2012 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1151 MIACHEL H. HICKS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HILDA L. SOLIS, District Manager, Secretary of Labor; ROBERT HARDMAN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Irene C. Berger, District Judge. (5:10-cv-01404) Submitted: May 24, 2012 Before MOTZ and Circuit Judge. DAVIS, Decided: Circuit Judges, and May 30, 2012 HAMILTON, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Miachel H. Hicks, Appellant Pro Se. Fred B. Westfall, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 12-1151 Doc: 15 Filed: 05/30/2012 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Miachel H. Hicks appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. raised in On the appeal, we Appellant’s confine brief. our review to the issues 4th Cir. R. 34(b). See Because Hicks’ informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Hicks has forfeited appellate review district of the court’s court’s order. judgment. Accordingly, We dispense with we affirm oral the argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?