Miachel Hicks v. Hilda Soli

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:10-cv-01404 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998863699]. Mailed to: Hicks. [12-1151]

Appeal: 12-1151

Doc: 15

Filed: 05/30/2012

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1151

MIACHEL H. HICKS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HILDA L. SOLIS,
District Manager,

Secretary

of

Labor;

ROBERT

HARDMAN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Beckley.
Irene C. Berger,
District Judge. (5:10-cv-01404)

Submitted:

May 24, 2012

Before MOTZ and
Circuit Judge.

DAVIS,

Decided:

Circuit

Judges,

and

May 30, 2012

HAMILTON,

Senior

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Miachel H. Hicks, Appellant Pro Se.
Fred B. Westfall, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-1151

Doc: 15

Filed: 05/30/2012

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Miachel H. Hicks appeals the district court’s order
adopting

the

recommendation

of

the

magistrate

judge

and

dismissing his civil action without prejudice for failure to
prosecute.
raised

in

On
the

appeal,

we

Appellant’s

confine
brief.

our

review

to

the

issues

4th

Cir.

R.

34(b).

See

Because Hicks’ informal brief does not challenge the basis for
the district court’s disposition, Hicks has forfeited appellate
review
district

of

the

court’s

court’s

order.

judgment.

Accordingly,

We

dispense

with

we

affirm

oral

the

argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2