Linda White v. Santee Cooper
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:10-cv-00536-RMG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998824445]. Mailed to: Linda White P. O. Box 122 St. Stephens, SC 29429. [12-1157]
Appeal: 12-1157
Document: 10
Date Filed: 04/03/2012
Page: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1157
LINDA WHITE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SANTEE COOPER,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston.
Richard Mark Gergel, District
Judge. (2:10-cv-00536-RMG)
Submitted:
March 29, 2012
Decided:
April 3, 2012
Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Linda White, Appellant Pro Se.
Stephen Lynwood Brown, YOUNG
CLEMENT RIVERS, LLP, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-1157
Document: 10
Date Filed: 04/03/2012
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
In
this
action
alleging
employment
discrimination,
Linda White appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation
of
the
magistrate
judgment in favor of the defendant.
and find no reversible error.
judge
and
granting
summary
We have reviewed the record
Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court.
White v. Cooper, No.
2:10-cv-00536-RMG (D.S.C. Jan. 19, 2012).
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?