Carmen Ramos v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998801555-2] Originating case number: 8:11-cv-03130-AW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998860959]. Mailed to: Carmen Ramos. [12-1166]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-1166 Doc: 13 Filed: 05/24/2012 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1166 CARMEN RAMOS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE; WELLS FARGO BANK, NA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:11-cv-03130-AW) Submitted: May 10, 2012 Before KING and Circuit Judge. SHEDD, Decided: Circuit Judges, and May 24, 2012 HAMILTON, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carmen Ramos, Appellant Pro Se. Michael S. Barranco, TREANOR, POPE & HUGHES, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 12-1166 Doc: 13 Filed: 05/24/2012 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Carmen Ramos appeals the district court’s order dismissing her claims arising from Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.’s refusal to consider her loan modification application. We have reviewed reversible error. the district court’s order and find no Accordingly, although we grant Ramos’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ramos v. Wells Fargo Home Mortg., Inc., No. 8:11-cv-03130-AW (D. Md. filed Jan. 26 & entered Jan. 27, 2012). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?