Lourdes Iglesias v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998806938-2] Originating case number: 2:11-cv-00341-MSD-FBS Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998868172]. Mailed to: Lourdes Iglesias. [12-1186]

Appeal: 12-1186

Doc: 8

Filed: 06/05/2012

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1186

LOURDES IGLESIAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WAL-MART STORES, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (2:11-cv-00341-MSD-FBS)

Submitted:

May 31, 2012

Decided:

June 5, 2012

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lourdes Iglesias, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-1186

Doc: 8

Filed: 06/05/2012

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Lourdes Iglesias seeks to appeal the district court’s
order dismissing, without prejudice, her civil action against
Wal-Mart

Stores,

reconsideration.

Inc.,

and

denying

her

motion

for

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over

final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory
and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 54546 (1949).

The orders Iglesias seeks to appeal are neither

final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders.
Accordingly,

we

deny

leave

to

proceed

in

forma

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

pauperis

and

We dispense with
contentions
the

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED