In re:Gary William
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998804138-2], updating fee code; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [998797279-2] Originating case number: 4:08-cr-00087-MSD-FBS-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998864020]. Mailed to: Williams. [12-1237]
Appeal: 12-1237
Doc: 9
Filed: 05/30/2012
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1237
In re:
GARY BUTERRA WILLIAMS,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
Submitted:
May 24, 2012
Before MOTZ and
Circuit Judge.
DAVIS,
Decided:
Circuit
Judges,
and
May 30, 2012
HAMILTON,
Senior
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gary Buterra Williams, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-1237
Doc: 9
Filed: 05/30/2012
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Gary Buterra Williams petitions for a writ of mandamus
seeking an order compelling the district court to reopen his
closed criminal case to hold an evidentiary hearing and transfer
him into federal custody.
We conclude that Williams is not
entitled to mandamus relief.
Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used
only
Dist.
in
extraordinary
Court,
Moussaoui,
mandamus
426
333
relief
circumstances.
U.S.
F.3d
is
509,
394,
402
516-17
available
only
clear right to the relief sought.
Kerr
(1976);
(4th
when
Cir.
the
v.
United
United
States
States
2003).
v.
Further,
petitioner
has
a
In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan
Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988).
The relief sought by Williams is not available by way
of mandamus.
Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in
forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
dispense
with
oral
argument
because
the
facts
and
We
legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?