In re:Gary William

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998804138-2], updating fee code; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [998797279-2] Originating case number: 4:08-cr-00087-MSD-FBS-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998864020]. Mailed to: Williams. [12-1237]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-1237 Doc: 9 Filed: 05/30/2012 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1237 In re: GARY BUTERRA WILLIAMS, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Submitted: May 24, 2012 Before MOTZ and Circuit Judge. DAVIS, Decided: Circuit Judges, and May 30, 2012 HAMILTON, Senior Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gary Buterra Williams, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 12-1237 Doc: 9 Filed: 05/30/2012 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Gary Buterra Williams petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order compelling the district court to reopen his closed criminal case to hold an evidentiary hearing and transfer him into federal custody. We conclude that Williams is not entitled to mandamus relief. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only Dist. in extraordinary Court, Moussaoui, mandamus 426 333 relief circumstances. U.S. F.3d is 509, 394, 402 516-17 available only clear right to the relief sought. Kerr (1976); (4th when Cir. the v. United United States States 2003). v. Further, petitioner has a In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). The relief sought by Williams is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. dispense with oral argument because the facts and We legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?