Gary Gray v. Wittstadt Title & Escrow Compa

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:11-cv-00111-MSD-TEM. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998919281]. Mailed to: Gary Gray. [12-1251]

Appeal: 12-1251

Doc: 28

Filed: 08/20/2012

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1251

GARY M. GRAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WITTSTADT TITLE AND ESCROW COMPANY LLC; MORRIS/ HARDWICK/
SCHNEIDER; ONE WEST BANK, FSB,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (4:11-cv-00111-MSD-TEM)

Submitted:

August 16, 2012

Decided:

August 20, 2012

Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gary M. Gray, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Roger Hildebeidel, MORRIS
HARDWICK SCHNEIDER, PLLC, Dulles, Virginia; Amy Elizabeth
Miller, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, McLean, Virginia; Anand Vijay Ramana,
MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-1251

Doc: 28

Filed: 08/20/2012

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Gary M. Gray appeals the district court’s dismissal of
his complaint and its denial of his post-judgment motions to
amend the judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) and to amend the
complaint.
error.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court.

Gray v. Wittstadt Title & Escrow Co., No. 4:11-

cv-00111-MSD-TEM (E.D. Va., Nov. 28, 2011, Jan. 25, 2012).
dispense

with

oral

argument

because

the

facts

and

We

legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2