James Riffin v. Patapsco Bank

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-03203-CCB,10-11248 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998907051]. Mailed to: Riffin. [12-1257]

Appeal: 12-1257

Doc: 11

Filed: 08/01/2012

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1257

In re:

JAMES RIFFIN,

Debtor,
-----------------------------------

JAMES RIFFIN,
Debtor – Appellant,
v.
PATAPSCO BANK
Creditor – Appellee,

MARK J. FRIEDMAN
Trustee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.
(1:11-cv-03203-CCB)

Submitted:

July 26, 2012

Decided:

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

August 1, 2012

Appeal: 12-1257

Doc: 11

Filed: 08/01/2012

Pg: 2 of 3

James Riffin, Appellant Pro Se.
Robert S. Glushakow, NOLAN,
PLUMHOFF & WILLIAMS, CHARTERED, Towson, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 12-1257

Doc: 11

Filed: 08/01/2012

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
James Riffin appeals the district court’s orders: (1)
granting

the

Appellee’s

unopposed

motion

to

dismiss

Riffin’s

appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order; and (2) denying his
motion for reconsideration of that order.
record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court.
Bank

(In

re

James

Riffin),

No.

Nov. 10, 2011; Jan. 25, 2012).

We have reviewed the

Riffin v. Patapsco

1:11-cv-03203-CCB

(D.

Md.

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3