Anne Mercer v. Drohan Management Group, Inc.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:10-cv-01212-GBL-IDD Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998922782].. [12-1300]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-1300 Doc: 27 Filed: 08/23/2012 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1300 ANNE MERCER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DROHAN MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:10-cv-01212-GBL-IDD) Submitted: August 9, 2012 Decided: August 23, 2012 Before DUNCAN and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Patricia A. Smith, LAW OFFICES OF PATRICIA A. SMITH, Alexandria, Virginia; Dale Edwin Sanders, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. David D. Hudgins, Juliane C. Miller, HUDGINS LAW FIRM, PC, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 12-1300 Doc: 27 Filed: 08/23/2012 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Anne granting Mercer Drohan appeals Management the Group, district Inc.’s court’s motion orders for summary judgment and denying Mercer’s Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 59(e) motion in this action brought under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C §§ 12101–12213. Having reviewed and considered the record, briefs, and applicable law, we are persuaded that the district court reached the correct result on the merits of Accordingly, each we of affirm Mercer’s the claims district pressed court’s on appeal. judgment based substantially on the reasoning set forth in the district court’s careful and thorough Group, Inc., Mercer v. No. Drohan opinions. Mercer 1:10-cv-1212 (E.D.Va. Management (E.D.Va. February 21, 2012). Group, v. Drohan November Inc., No. Management 28, 2011); 1:10-cv-1212 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?