Sharon McLaughlin v. Inmar, Inc.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-00983-CCE-LPA. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998906819]. Mailed to: Sharon McLaughlin. [12-1309]

Appeal: 12-1309

Doc: 15

Filed: 08/01/2012

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1309

SHARON H. MCLAUGHLIN, f/k/a Sharon H. Goodman,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
INMAR, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles,
District Judge. (1:11-cv-00983-CCE-LPA)

Submitted:

July 26, 2012

Decided:

August 1, 2012

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sharon H. McLaughlin, Appellant Pro Se.
Charles Archibald
Edwards, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Winston-Salem,
North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-1309

Doc: 15

Filed: 08/01/2012

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Sharon

H.

McLaughlin

appeals

the

district

court’s

order denying her motion to amend her complaint, dismissing her
claim

under

U.S.C.A.

Title

§ 2000e

VII
to

of

the

2000e-17

Civil
(West

Rights
2003

&

Act

of

Supp.

1964,

2012),

42
and

compelling arbitration pursuant to the terms of her employment
contract with the defendant.
find no reversible error.
in

forma

pauperis

district court.
CCE-LPA

(M.D.N.C.

and

We have reviewed the record and

Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed

affirm

for

the

reasons

stated

by

the

McLaughlin v. Inmar, Inc., No. 1:11-cv-00983Feb.

13,

2012).

We

dispense

with

oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2