Arthur Nowell v. Tony Cooper

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:12-cv-00015-MSD-DEM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998839990]. Mailed to: A. Nowell. [12-1313]

Appeal: 12-1313

Document: 12

Date Filed: 04/25/2012

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1313

ARTHUR MATTHEWS NOWELL,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
TONY COOPER, Engineer Maintenance Supervisor (Professional
Hospitality Resources); MIAMI DAVIS, Assistant Engineer
Supervisor
(Professional
Hospitality
Resources);
DENA
CURRENT, Human Resource Manager (Professional Hospitality
Resources),
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (2:12-cv-00015-MSD-DEM)

Submitted:

April 19, 2012

Decided:

April 25, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arthur Matthews Nowell, Appellant Pro Se.
Sara Berg
WILLIAMS MULLEN, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.

Rafal,

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-1313

Document: 12

Date Filed: 04/25/2012

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Arthur

Matthews

Nowell

appeals

the

district

court’s

order granting Defendants’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to
dismiss his civil action.
no reversible error.

We have reviewed the record and find

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
Nowell v. Cooper, No. 2:12-cv-

stated by the district court.

00015-MSD-DEM (E.D. Va. Feb. 28, 2012).

We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2