Steven Morales v. Officer Richardson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:11-cv-03215-JFM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998927129].. [12-1324]

Appeal: 12-1324

Doc: 24

Filed: 08/29/2012

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1324

STEVEN MORALES; LUCIANO MORALES,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
OFFICER DOMINIQUE RICHARDSON, Badge No. 3066; PRINCE
GEORGE’S COUNTY, MARYLAND, a body corporate and politic,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (8:11-cv-03215-JFM)

Submitted:

August 2, 2012

Decided:

August 29, 2012

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terrell N. Roberts, III, ROBERTS & WOOD, Riverdale, Maryland,
for Appellants. Tonia Y. Belton-Gofreed, PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY
OFFICE OF LAW, Upper Marlboro, Maryland; Daniel Karp, Russell
Gray, KARPINSKI, COLARESI & KARP, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-1324

Doc: 24

Filed: 08/29/2012

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Steven

Morales

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) claims and its subsequent
order

denying

his

motion

to

amend

the

judgment.

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
we

affirm

for

the

reasons

stated

by

the

We

have

Accordingly,

district

court.

Morales v. Richardson, No. 8:11-cv-03215-JFM (D. Md. Jan. 30,
2012; Mar. 6, 2012).
facts

and

materials

legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the

contentions

are

adequately

the

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2