Jewel Hill v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:12-cv-00130-HEH. Opinion denies motion for transcript at govenment expense and denies motion to certify questions to the United States and Virginia Attorneys General.--[Edited 07/23/2012 by SEN] Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998900029]. Mailed to: Jewel Hill. [12-1380]
Appeal: 12-1380
Doc: 12
Filed: 07/23/2012
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1380
JEWEL D. HILL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
representatives, attorneys, et al,
and
their
agents,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:12-cv-00130-HEH)
Submitted:
July 19, 2012
Decided:
July 23, 2012
Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jewel D. Hill, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-1380
Doc: 12
Filed: 07/23/2012
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Jewel
D.
Hill
appeals
the
district
court’s
orders
dismissing without prejudice her civil suit for damages relating
to an automobile accident and denying her motions to certify
constitutional
questions
to
the
United
States
Attorneys General and for judicial recusal.
the record and find no reversible error.
for
the
reasons
stated
by
the
and
Virginia
We have reviewed
Accordingly, we affirm
district
court.
Hill
v.
Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co., No. 3:12-cv-00130-HEH (E.D. Va. Feb.
23 & Feb 24, 2012).
We deny Hill’s motions for a transcript at
Government expense and to certify questions to the United States
and Virginia Attorneys General.
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?