Jennifer Wilson v. SunTrust Bank

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:11-cv-00580-FDW-DSC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998913962]. Mailed to: Jennifer Wilson. [12-1393]

Appeal: 12-1393

Doc: 18

Filed: 08/13/2012

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1393

JENNIFER L. WILSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SUNTRUST BANK, Incorporated in Georgia; SUNTRUST MORTGAGE
INC.; RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC, f/k/a Residential
Funding Corporation,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
HUTCHENS, SENTER, BRITTON, PA; JOHN/JANE DOE 1-10,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
Frank D. Whitney,
District Judge. (3:11-cv-00580-FDW-DSC)

Submitted:

July 30, 2012

Decided:

August 13, 2012

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jennifer L. Wilson, Appellant Pro Se.
Julia Bright Hartley,
Christina Rampey Hunoval, NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH,
LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Appeal: 12-1393

Doc: 18

Filed: 08/13/2012

Pg: 2 of 3

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 12-1393

Doc: 18

Filed: 08/13/2012

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Jennifer

L.

Wilson

seeks

to

appeal

the

district

court’s order dismissing her claims as to some, but not all, of
the Defendants in her civil action.

This court may exercise

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006),
and

certain

interlocutory

and

collateral

orders,

28

U.S.C.

§ 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).
to

appeal

is

neither

a

final

interlocutory or collateral order.
appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

order

The order Wilson seeks
nor

an

appealable

Accordingly, we dismiss the

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED

3