In Re: Lionell Ephraim

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998822246-2]; denying Motion for writ of habeas corpus (FRAP 21) [998822245-2]; denying Motion to expedite decision [998822250-2]. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-00107. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998863858]. Mailed to: Lionell Ephraim. [12-1407]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-1407 Doc: 6 Filed: 05/30/2012 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1407 In re: Williams, LIONELL ELIJAH EPHRAIM, a/k/a Lionel Elizah Petitioner. On Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. (1:11-cv-00107) Submitted: May 24, 2012 Before MOTZ and Circuit Judge. DAVIS, Decided: Circuit Judges, and May 30, 2012 HAMILTON, Senior Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lionell Elijah Ephraim, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 12-1407 Doc: 6 Filed: 05/30/2012 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Lionel Elijah Ephraim filed a petition for an original writ of habeas corpus challenging his 1991 sentence. This court ordinarily declines to entertain original habeas petitions filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2011), and this case provides no reason to depart from the general rule. Moreover, we find that the interests of justice would not be served by transferring the case to the district court. 1631 (2006); Fed. R. App. P. 22(a). See 28 U.S.C. § Accordingly, while we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we dismiss the petition. We also deny Ephraim’s motion to expedite the proceedings. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?