In Re: Lionell Ephraim
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998822246-2]; denying Motion for writ of habeas corpus (FRAP 21) [998822245-2]; denying Motion to expedite decision [998822250-2]. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-00107. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998863858]. Mailed to: Lionell Ephraim. [12-1407]
Appeal: 12-1407
Doc: 6
Filed: 05/30/2012
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1407
In re:
Williams,
LIONELL
ELIJAH
EPHRAIM,
a/k/a
Lionel
Elizah
Petitioner.
On Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.
(1:11-cv-00107)
Submitted:
May 24, 2012
Before MOTZ and
Circuit Judge.
DAVIS,
Decided:
Circuit
Judges,
and
May 30, 2012
HAMILTON,
Senior
Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lionell Elijah Ephraim, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-1407
Doc: 6
Filed: 05/30/2012
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Lionel Elijah Ephraim filed a petition for an original
writ of habeas corpus challenging his 1991 sentence.
This court
ordinarily declines to entertain original habeas petitions filed
under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2011), and this case
provides no reason to depart from the general rule.
Moreover,
we find that the interests of justice would not be served by
transferring the case to the district court.
1631 (2006); Fed. R. App. P. 22(a).
See 28 U.S.C. §
Accordingly, while we grant
leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we dismiss the petition.
We
also deny Ephraim’s motion to expedite the proceedings.
We
dispense
with
oral
argument
because
the
facts
and
legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?