Tawanda Blair v. Commissioner of SSA
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion transfer case [998872028-2] Originating case number: 8:11-cv-01476-RMG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998880037]. Mailed to: Tawanda Blair. [12-1435]
Appeal: 12-1435
Doc: 17
Filed: 06/21/2012
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1435
TAWANDA BLAIR, on behalf of JDS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Richard M. Gergel, District Judge.
(8:11-cv-01476-RMG)
Submitted:
June 18, 2012
Decided:
June 21, 2012
Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tawanda Blair, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, Assistant
United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-1435
Doc: 17
Filed: 06/21/2012
Pg: 2 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Tawanda
order
Blair
upholding
the
seeks
to
appeal
Commissioner’s
the
district
court’s
decision
denying
Blair’s
application for supplemental security income filed on behalf of
her minor child.
The district court referred this case to a
magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(B) (West
2006 & Supp. 2011).
The magistrate judge recommended that the
Commissioner’s decision be upheld and advised Blair that failure
to
file
timely
appellate
objections
review
of
a
to
the
district
recommendation
court
order
could
based
waive
upon
the
recommendation.
The
magistrate
timely
judge’s
filing
of
recommendation
specific
is
objections
necessary
to
to
a
preserve
appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when
the
parties
noncompliance.
have
been
warned
of
the
consequences
of
Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th
Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985).
Blair
has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after
receiving proper warning.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal
contentions
are
adequately
2
presented
in
the
materials
Appeal: 12-1435
before
Doc: 17
Filed: 06/21/2012
the
and
process.
court
Pg: 3 of 3
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional
The motion to transfer to Atlanta, Georgia, is denied.
DISMISSED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?