Tawanda Blair v. Commissioner of SSA

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion transfer case [998872028-2] Originating case number: 8:11-cv-01476-RMG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998880037]. Mailed to: Tawanda Blair. [12-1435]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-1435 Doc: 17 Filed: 06/21/2012 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1435 TAWANDA BLAIR, on behalf of JDS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Richard M. Gergel, District Judge. (8:11-cv-01476-RMG) Submitted: June 18, 2012 Decided: June 21, 2012 Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tawanda Blair, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 12-1435 Doc: 17 Filed: 06/21/2012 Pg: 2 of 3 PER CURIAM: Tawanda order Blair upholding the seeks to appeal Commissioner’s the district court’s decision denying Blair’s application for supplemental security income filed on behalf of her minor child. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(B) (West 2006 & Supp. 2011). The magistrate judge recommended that the Commissioner’s decision be upheld and advised Blair that failure to file timely appellate objections review of a to the district recommendation court order could based waive upon the recommendation. The magistrate timely judge’s filing of recommendation specific is objections necessary to to a preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties noncompliance. have been warned of the consequences of Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Blair has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper warning. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 2 presented in the materials Appeal: 12-1435 before Doc: 17 Filed: 06/21/2012 the and process. court Pg: 3 of 3 argument would not aid the decisional The motion to transfer to Atlanta, Georgia, is denied. DISMISSED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?