In re: Paul Scinto, Sr.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for stay pending appeal [998846610-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [998830293-2] Originating case number: 4:01-cr-00059-H-1,4:03-cv-00130 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998906908]. Mailed to: Paul Scinto, Sr.. [12-1457]

Appeal: 12-1457

Doc: 8

Filed: 08/01/2012

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1457

In re:

PAUL SCINTO, SR.,
Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(Nos. 4:01-cr-00059-H-1; 4:03-cv-00130)

Submitted:

July 26, 2012

Decided: August 1, 2012

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul Scinto, Sr., Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-1457

Doc: 8

Filed: 08/01/2012

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Paul Scinto, Sr., petitions for a writ of mandamus,
alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on
his coram nobis petition.

He seeks an order from this court

directing the district court to act.

We find there has been no

undue delay in the district court.

Accordingly, we deny the

mandamus petition and Scinto’s motion to stay.

We dispense with

oral

contentions

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

the

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

2